Review Process
How IELTS Writing AI checks pages before users trust them
This page explains who owns review responsibility, what gets checked, and how correction requests are handled when page copy, educational examples, or product claims drift out of sync.
3 layers
Content, criteria, and product-behavior checks
1 inbox
Users can report unclear explanations or stale claims directly
Live alignment
Marketing and educational pages are checked against actual checker behavior
Who reviews what
Different review responsibilities exist for different risks: unclear educational advice, weak criteria mapping, and mismatches between the page and the actual product.
Editorial Team
Owns article clarity, topical coverage, and whether a page answers the search intent a candidate actually has.
Criteria Review Workflow
Checks that pages about score improvement still map advice to Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy.
Product Feedback QA
Compares marketing copy and help content against actual product behavior so free, monthly, and yearly expectations stay aligned.
Meet the reviewers
Every educational page and blog post on this site is reviewed by one of the named people below. Their credentials and LinkedIn / Wikidata profiles are linked from each profile page so AI engines can resolve them as real entities.
IELTS Writing Reviewer
Maria Chen
Senior Content Reviewer, IELTS Writing AI
- IELTS Writing Task 2
- Band descriptors (TR, CC, LR, GRA)
- Argument development
Maria has reviewed more than 4,000 IELTS Writing essays across Task 1 and Task 2 since joining the platform in 2024. She maps every flagged pattern back to the four official band descriptors — Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy — so candidates see criterion-level fixes, not generic grammar notes.
View full profile →
PhD, Applied Linguistics
Dr. James Hartley
Editorial Standards Lead, IELTS Writing AI
- Second-language writing assessment
- IELTS band descriptors
- Academic writing feedback
James holds a PhD in Applied Linguistics and has published peer-reviewed work on second-language writing assessment. At IELTS Writing AI he owns the editorial standard that connects every educational page back to the official IELTS band descriptors, so the platform's advice stays aligned with how real examiners score.
View full profile →
What gets checked before a page is treated as current
- Does the page still match the actual checker workflow and pricing behavior?
- Does the explanation stay anchored to Task Response, Coherence, Lexical Resource, and Grammar when relevant?
- Would an IELTS candidate understand what to fix next, or is the page drifting into vague advice?
Product changes
Pages are reviewed when checker behavior, pricing flow, or report depth changes enough to affect user expectations.
Criteria drift
Pages are revisited when examples or explanations stop mapping cleanly to the four IELTS writing criteria.
User-reported issues
If users report unclear feedback, stale claims, or mismatches between the page and the product, that URL is sent into correction review.
Request a review or correction
To report a questionable explanation, a stale pricing statement, or a mismatch between page copy and the product, email support@ieltswritinganalytics.com with the page URL and what appears incorrect.
Want to compare the page with the real product?
Open the checker, run a practice essay, and compare the output with the review commitments on this page. That is the fastest way to see whether the product and the site still match.