of your writing score
words required
minutes recommended
Each type requires a different structure. Know them all.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Discuss both views and give your opinion
What are the advantages and disadvantages?
What problems does this cause and what solutions can you suggest?
Answer two direct questions
Use this 4-paragraph structure for any essay type
40-60 words
💡 NEVER copy the question word-for-word
80-100 words
💡 Use specific examples from your country or real events
80-100 words
💡 Use transition words: Furthermore, Moreover, In addition
40-50 words
💡 Never introduce new ideas in conclusion
Study these examples to understand examiner expectations
Introduction: Extreme sports such as skydiving and motor racing have become increasingly popular in recent years. While some argue that these activities should be prohibited due to their inherent risks, I believe that outright bans are neither feasible nor desirable, and that regulation and education are better alternatives.
Body 1: Those who advocate for banning dangerous sports often cite public safety as their primary concern. They argue that when accidents occur in these activities, they not only harm participants but also place a burden on healthcare systems and emergency services. For example, when a BASE jumper requires rescue after an accident, it diverts police and medical resources that could be used elsewhere...
Body 2: However, I would argue that prohibition is neither practical nor justified. Firstly, defining what constitutes a 'dangerous' sport is highly subjective; even common activities like swimming or cycling carry risks. Secondly, adults should have the autonomy to make informed decisions about their own safety, provided they understand the risks involved...
Conclusion: In conclusion, while dangerous sports do present genuine safety concerns, banning them is not the solution. Instead, governments should focus on implementing strict safety regulations and ensuring participants are properly educated about risks...
Introduction: In the modern era, technology has revolutionized the way people communicate and interact with one another. While some argue that digital devices have enhanced our ability to connect, others believe they have damaged real human relationships. This essay will examine both perspectives.
Body 1 (View 1): Proponents of technology argue that it has made communication more accessible and efficient than ever before. Social media platforms and messaging apps allow people to maintain relationships across vast distances instantaneously. For instance, families separated by continents can now have daily video calls, something impossible just decades ago...
Body 2 (View 2): Conversely, critics contend that these digital interactions lack the depth and authenticity of face-to-face communication. They argue that excessive screen time has reduced the quality of our relationships, with many people feeling more isolated despite having hundreds of online 'friends'...
Conclusion: In my view, while technology has undoubtedly transformed communication, its impact depends largely on how it is used. When balanced with in-person interaction, digital tools can enhance rather than replace genuine human connection...
These errors will drop you an entire band
State your opinion clearly in intro and conclusion
Aim for 270-300 words
Include specific examples in every body paragraph
Stay focused on the question throughout
Use academic vocabulary and formal register
Always write a conclusion, even if running out of time