Change is always a good thing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The relentless pace of change in modern society—from technological innovation to social transformation—has led some to embrace change uncritically as inherently positive. While change often drives progress, I strongly disagree with the notion that it is always beneficial, as it can also bring significant disruption and loss.
Undeniably, change has been the engine of human advancement. Scientific discoveries, technological innovations, and social reforms have improved living standards, extended lifespans, and expanded human rights in ways previously unimaginable. The transformation of communication through the internet, advances in medical treatments, and the gradual dismantling of discriminatory systems all demonstrate how positive change can enhance human flourishing.
However, not all change is beneficial. Environmental degradation, the erosion of traditional communities, and the psychological stress of constant adaptation illustrate the darker side of rapid transformation. Changes that destroy stable livelihoods, sever social bonds, or compromise ethical values may bring short-term efficiency while causing long-term harm. Moreover, the assumption that newer is always better often leads to discarding valuable traditions, knowledge, and practices that have stood the test of time.
In conclusion, while change is an inevitable and often positive force, I firmly believe that its value depends entirely on its direction and consequences. We should evaluate change critically rather than embracing it uncritically.
(Word count: 224)
不加批判地
“embrace change uncritically”
无情的
“relentless pace”
拆除
“dismantling of discriminatory systems”
退化
“environmental degradation”
has led some to embrace (present perfect)
in ways previously unimaginable (relative clause)
that destroy stable livelihoods (relative clause)
depends entirely on its direction (simple present)
Context + thesis (strongly disagree)
Counter-argument: Benefits of change (progress, improvement)
Main argument: Negative changes (environment, community, stress)
Restate position + critical evaluation needed
Fully addresses the task. Clear position with well-developed arguments.
How fully the question is answered, position is clear, ideas are developed
Logical organization. Effective cohesive devices.
Organization, paragraphing, and use of cohesive devices
Wide range with sophisticated word choice.
Vocabulary range, accuracy, and appropriateness
Complex structures with accuracy.
Variety and accuracy of grammatical structures
Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
University education should be free for all students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems are too big for individual countries to solve. Only international cooperation can address them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Average improvement of 0.8 band, 73% break through the 6.5 plateau
India
“The analysis showed I wasn't using examples properly. Once I fixed that, my score jumped! The AI feedback was incredibly specific.”
