Some people think history has nothing to offer in the modern world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The relevance of studying history in an era dominated by technology and rapid change has been questioned by some who view the past as irrelevant to contemporary challenges. While I understand the desire to focus on forward-looking skills, I strongly believe that history provides invaluable lessons that remain essential for navigating the complexities of the modern world.
Those who dismiss history as irrelevant often argue that contemporary society faces unprecedented challenges—climate change, artificial intelligence, and globalization—that have no historical parallels. They contend that time spent studying past events would be better invested in acquiring technical skills and scientific knowledge directly applicable to current problems. From this perspective, history appears as an academic luxury rather than a practical necessity.
However, this view ignores the fundamental patterns of human behavior and societal development that history illuminates. Understanding how democracies have risen and fallen, how economic systems have evolved, and how societies have responded to crises provides crucial context for current decision-making. History teaches us about the consequences of actions, helping leaders and citizens avoid repeating past mistakes. Moreover, historical knowledge fosters critical thinking skills—the ability to analyze evidence, evaluate sources, and understand multiple perspectives—that are transferable to any field.
In conclusion, while modern challenges require new solutions, I firmly believe that historical understanding provides essential context, warns against repeating errors, and develops critical thinking skills that are more valuable than ever in our complex world.
(Word count: 247)
前所未有的
“unprecedented challenges”
相似处
“historical parallels”
阐明
“history illuminates”
可转移的
“transferable to any field”
has been questioned by some who view (passive + relative)
that have no historical parallels (relative clause)
that time spent studying... would be better invested (passive)
Understanding how democracies have risen (gerund subject)
Context + thesis (strongly disagree)
Counter-argument: History irrelevant to modern challenges
Main argument: Patterns, consequences, critical thinking
Restate position + summary
Fully addresses the task. Clear position with well-developed arguments.
How fully the question is answered, position is clear, ideas are developed
Logical organization. Effective cohesive devices.
Organization, paragraphing, and use of cohesive devices
Wide range of vocabulary with sophisticated word choice.
Vocabulary range, accuracy, and appropriateness
Complex structures with accuracy.
Variety and accuracy of grammatical structures
Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
University education should be free for all students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems are too big for individual countries to solve. Only international cooperation can address them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Average improvement of 0.8 band, 73% break through the 6.5 plateau
India
“The analysis showed I wasn't using examples properly. Once I fixed that, my score jumped! The AI feedback was incredibly specific.”