Nuclear energy is the best solution to energy crisis. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the world grapples with climate change and depleting fossil fuel reserves, nuclear power has been proposed as a clean, reliable energy solution. While nuclear energy offers significant advantages, I believe it is not the best solution when considering safety concerns, waste management, and the potential of renewable alternatives.
Proponents of nuclear energy highlight its ability to generate large amounts of electricity with minimal carbon emissions, making it an attractive option for reducing greenhouse gases. Unlike solar or wind power, nuclear plants can operate continuously regardless of weather conditions, providing baseload power essential for grid stability. Additionally, modern reactor designs have improved safety features compared to older facilities.
However, the risks associated with nuclear power cannot be ignored. Catastrophic accidents, though rare, have devastating and long-lasting consequences for human health and the environment. The problem of radioactive waste disposal remains unsolved, with spent fuel requiring secure storage for thousands of years. Furthermore, the high costs of building and decommissioning nuclear plants, combined with declining renewable energy prices, make nuclear less economically attractive than once thought.
In conclusion, while nuclear energy has a role to play in the transition away from fossil fuels, I believe a diversified portfolio emphasizing renewables, improved storage technology, and energy efficiency represents a safer, more sustainable long-term solution than relying heavily on nuclear power.
(Word count: 229)
努力解决
“grapples with climate change”
基荷
“baseload power”
灾难性的
“catastrophic accidents”
组合
“diversified portfolio”
has been proposed as (present perfect passive)
When considering safety concerns (subordinate clause)
unlike solar or wind power (prepositional phrase)
requiring secure storage (present participle)
Context + thesis (disagree - not the best)
Counter-argument: Benefits of nuclear (low carbon, reliability)
Main argument: Safety, waste, costs, renewable alternatives
Restate position + diversified solution
Fully addresses the task. Clear position with well-developed arguments.
How fully the question is answered, position is clear, ideas are developed
Logical organization. Effective cohesive devices.
Organization, paragraphing, and use of cohesive devices
Wide range with sophisticated word choice.
Vocabulary range, accuracy, and appropriateness
Complex structures with accuracy.
Variety and accuracy of grammatical structures
Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
University education should be free for all students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems are too big for individual countries to solve. Only international cooperation can address them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Average improvement of 0.8 band, 73% break through the 6.5 plateau
India
“The analysis showed I wasn't using examples properly. Once I fixed that, my score jumped! The AI feedback was incredibly specific.”
