University education should be free for all students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether higher education should be freely accessible to all students has sparked intense debate in recent years. While the financial burden on taxpayers cannot be ignored, I firmly believe that providing free university education would yield substantial long-term benefits for both individuals and society as a whole.
Admittedly, implementing free university education presents significant challenges. Governments would face enormous fiscal pressures, potentially requiring tax increases or reallocation of funds from other crucial sectors such as healthcare or infrastructure. Critics argue that individuals who directly benefit from higher education should bear at least some of the costs, rather than expecting the general population to subsidize their career advancement. Furthermore, there is a legitimate concern that removing financial barriers might lead to overcrowded universities and diminished educational quality.
Nevertheless, the advantages of free university education are compelling. Firstly, equal access to higher education promotes social mobility by enabling talented students from disadvantaged backgrounds to reach their full potential, regardless of their financial circumstances. This creates a more equitable society where success is determined by merit rather than socioeconomic status. Additionally, a highly educated workforce drives innovation, economic growth, and global competitiveness. Countries with well-educated populations consistently outperform others in terms of productivity and technological advancement. The long-term economic benefits of an educated populace would likely outweigh the initial costs of implementation.
In conclusion, while the financial implications of free university education are considerable, I strongly believe that the social and economic benefits make it a worthwhile investment. By ensuring that higher education is accessible to all, we create a more equitable, innovative, and prosperous society.
(Word count: 287)
财政的
“enormous fiscal pressures”
资助
“subsidize their career advancement”
社会流动性
“promotes social mobility”
民众
“educated populace”
The question of whether... has sparked intense debate (complex noun phrase)
regardless of their financial circumstances (prepositional phrase)
where success is determined by... (relative clause)
would likely outweigh... (modal verb with adverb)
Context + thesis statement (agree)
Counter-argument: Financial challenges, fiscal pressures, overcrowding concerns
Main argument: Social mobility, meritocracy, economic benefits
Restate position + broader implications
Fully addresses the task with a clear position. Arguments are well-developed with supporting evidence.
How fully the question is answered, position is clear, ideas are developed
Clear logical progression. Paragraphing is effective. Wide range of cohesive devices used appropriately.
Organization, paragraphing, and use of cohesive devices
Extensive vocabulary with sophisticated word choice and collocations.
Vocabulary range, accuracy, and appropriateness
Complex structures used with flexibility and accuracy.
Variety and accuracy of grammatical structures
Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems are too big for individual countries to solve. Only international cooperation can address them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
औसत सुधार 0.8 बैंड, 73% ने 6.5 की बाधा पार की
India
“The analysis showed I wasn't using examples properly. Once I fixed that, my score jumped! The AI feedback was incredibly specific.”