Should governments make recycling compulsory? To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The escalating global waste crisis has prompted many to call for mandatory recycling programs to reduce landfill burden and conserve resources. While I acknowledge enforcement challenges, I strongly believe that compulsory recycling is necessary to address environmental threats effectively.
Opponents of mandatory recycling raise legitimate concerns about implementation. They argue that enforcement would require significant government resources for monitoring and compliance checking, potentially diverting funds from other priorities. Additionally, they contend that education and incentives might achieve similar results without infringing on personal freedoms. Some also point out that recycling infrastructure varies significantly by region, making universal mandates impractical in areas lacking processing facilities.
However, the environmental imperative outweighs these practical concerns. Voluntary programs have consistently failed to achieve participation rates necessary for meaningful impact. Landfills are reaching capacity, oceans are choking on plastic, and valuable resources are being squandered while extraction of virgin materials continues unabated. Compulsory recycling creates systemic change by establishing clear expectations, normalizing sustainable behavior, and generating economies of scale that make recycling more economically viable.
In conclusion, while mandatory recycling presents implementation challenges, I firmly believe that the environmental crisis demands decisive action. Governments should combine compulsory programs with education and infrastructure investment to create lasting change.
(Word count: 218)
升级的
“escalating global waste crisis”
不减弱的
“continues unabated”
必要的
“environmental imperative”
规模经济
“generate economies of scale”
has prompted many to call for (present perfect)
would require significant government resources (modal)
while extraction of virgin materials continues (time clause)
demands decisive action (simple present)
Context + thesis (agree - compulsory)
Counter-argument: Enforcement challenges, practical concerns
Main argument: Environmental crisis, systemic change needed
Restate position + combination approach
Fully addresses the task. Clear position with well-developed arguments.
How fully the question is answered, position is clear, ideas are developed
Logical organization. Effective cohesive devices.
Organization, paragraphing, and use of cohesive devices
Wide range with sophisticated word choice.
Vocabulary range, accuracy, and appropriateness
Complex structures with accuracy.
Variety and accuracy of grammatical structures
Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
University education should be free for all students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems are too big for individual countries to solve. Only international cooperation can address them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Genomsnittlig förbättring med 0.8 band, 73% klarar 6.5
India
“The analysis showed I wasn't using examples properly. Once I fixed that, my score jumped! The AI feedback was incredibly specific.”
